番茄社区

Sectors
A middle-aged man with short gray hair and glasses, wearing a black suit, white shirt, and yellow patterned tie, poses in an office setting, reflecting the professionalism of top Chicago lawyers.

Richard S. Davis

Retired Partner

Richard S. Davis

Retired Partner

Richard Davis practiced complex commercial litigation for more than 35 years. He was a member of the firm’s Securities Enforcement & Litigation; Consumer Law, Finance & Class Action, and Commercial Litigation Practices. He had extensive experience in health care, distribution and franchise, and hospitality matters.

Prior to joining 番茄社区; Lardner, Rich was a litigation partner with the Chicago office of Rudnick & Wolfe, a predecessor firm to DLA Piper. From 1994 to 2006, he worked in Foley鈥檚 former West Palm Beach office. Rich, who resides in Boca Raton, maintained an active practice throughout South Florida, as well as elsewhere in the state.

 

Representative Experience

  • Won dismissal, with prejudice, of a multimillion-dollar consumer class action lawsuit alleging that a real estate developer wrongfully required purchasers to buy title insurance. (U.S. District Court, Miami)
  • Won dismissal of a product mislabeling case alleging violations of Florida鈥檚 Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, and seeking the removal of a nationally known consumer product from hundreds of retail stores in Florida, plus damages. (Circuit Court, County Court, West Palm Beach)
  • Won judgment as a matter of law (directed verdict) on the fourth day of a jury trial for an investment company client. The client鈥檚 former chief operating officer sought more than US$10m in damages on Equal Pay Act and Title VII claims. (U.S. District Court, Orlando)
  • Won summary judgment, as co-counsel for a Fortune 50 company, in a lawsuit alleging breach of contract and fraud claims related to the company鈥檚 alleged failure to contribute US$7m to a start-up technology venture. (U.S. District Court, West Palm Beach)
  • Won dismissal of two underwriting firms from a securities fraud class action lawsuit arising from a public company鈥檚 US$20m initial public offering. (U.S. District Court, Miami)
  • Won dismissal of a former investment advisor to Miami-Dade County from a tortious interference lawsuit brought by one of the County鈥檚 former bond underwriting firms. (U.S. District Court, Miami)
  • Obtained dismissal for a Fortune 50 company of four lawsuits filed by a health care provider alleging underpayment by a health insurance plan provider. (U.S. District Court, West Palm Beach, and Circuit Court, West Palm Beach)
  • Obtained dismissal of a defamation action, for a Fortune 50 company, for 0.01% of US$3m in claimed damages by the plaintiff鈥檚 acceptance of an Offer of Judgment. (Circuit Court, Tavernier/Key Largo)
  • Won summary judgment, as co-counsel for a Fortune 50 company, of a seven-figure聽lawsuit alleging defamation and tortious interference claims. (Circuit Court, Orlando)
  • Won a seven-figure聽arbitration award against a public company for its failure to timely process a former director鈥檚 exercise of stock options. (Private arbitration, Orlando)
  • Successfully settled, on behalf of a public company and its directors, a securities fraud class action lawsuit arising from the company鈥檚 US$37m initial public offering. (U.S. District Court, Tampa)
  • Successfully settled, as co-counsel for a leading website hosting provider, a consumer class action lawsuit alleging a Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act claim, for small percentages of the damages and attorney鈥檚 fees sought. (Circuit Court, Fort Lauderdale)
  • Represented a public company and its directors in seven class action lawsuits seeking to enjoin a US$200+m acquisition of the company鈥檚 stock. (U.S. District Court, Tampa, and Circuit Court, St. Petersburg)
  • Successfully settled various litigation asserting claims for breaches of stock purchase, asset acquisition and shareholder agreements; breaches of franchise agreements; breaches of non-competition agreements; misappropriation of trade secrets and trademark infringement.

Awards and Recognition

  • Rich has been Peer Review Rated as AV Preeminent庐, the highest performance rating in the Martindale-Hubbell庐 Peer Review Ratings鈩 system.

Community Involvement

  • Former member of the boards of Junior Achievement of the Palm Beaches and the Young Adult Division of the Jewish Federation of South Palm Beach County.
  • Former tutor in the Fourth Presbyterian Church program for disadvantaged youth in Chicago
  • Former mentor in the Brandeis University Career Beginnings program
  • Former volunteer in the Chicago Sun-Times Homework Hotline program

Presentations and Publications

  • 鈥淓leventh Circuit Vacates Pre-Spokeo 鈥楤eat the Clock鈥 FACTA Class Action Settlement for Lack of Standing Post-Spokeo,鈥 JD Supra (December 16, 2020)
  • 鈥淒ivided Eleventh Circuit Panel Bars Incentive Awards for Class Representatives in Class Action Settlements,鈥 JD Supra (September 23, 2020)
  • 鈥淪upreme Court Rejects Tolling Argument for Nonnamed Class Members鈥 Section 11 Claims,鈥 The National Law Review (June 26, 2017)
  • 鈥淔lorida Class Action Case Law Aligns With Comcast Ruling,鈥 Law360 (Appellate, Class Action, Consumer Protection, Florida) (November 25, 2014)
  • 鈥淢um’s The Word on Fla.’s Muddled Commonality Standard,鈥 Law360 (Appellate, Class Action, Consumer Protection, Florida) (November 5, 2014)
  • 鈥淭hree Major Supreme Court Decisions on the 1934 Act During 2011,鈥 Legal News: Securities Enforcement & Litigation (November 28, 2011)
September 8, 2025 Honors and Awards

Foley Receives Equal Justice Pro Bono Award from Legal Services of Greater Miami

番茄社区; Lardner LLP is a recipient of the Legal Services of Greater Miami鈥檚 Equal Justice Pro Bono Big Firm Award.
The front exterior of the United States Supreme Court building with columns and steps, under a partly cloudy sky鈥攁 symbol of justice that inspires law offices and litigation support across the nation.
May 22, 2024 Consumer Class Defense Counsel

Master of Its Choice of Forum?

On April 29, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to review whether a plaintiff may compel the remand of a case removed on the basis of federal question jurisdiction by voluntarily amending its complaint to leave only state law claims
Close-up view of several large stone columns with vertical grooves, typical of classical architecture, lined up in a row鈥攁n elegant look often found at prestigious corporate law office entrances.
August 11, 2022 Consumer Class Defense Counsel

No Incentive Awards for Class Representatives 鈥 Eleventh Circuit Rejects Reconsideration En Banc of Its One-of-a-Kind Bar

Last week, the Eleventh Circuit declined, 7鈥4, to reconsider en banc a divided panel鈥檚 September 2020 decision barring incentive awards to class representatives for their work in class actions.
A wooden judge鈥檚 gavel rests on a desk in a corporate law office, with brass scales and legal books鈥攑erfect for lawyers in Chicago who specialize in intellectual property law.
December 15, 2020 Blogs

Eleventh Circuit Vacates Pre-Spokeo 鈥淏eat the Clock鈥 FACTA Class Action Settlement for Lack of Standing Post-Spokeo

The Eleventh Circuit, sitting en banc, has vacated a pre-Spokeo 鈥渂eat the clock鈥 class action settlement for lack of standing post-Spokeo. This decision is reflective of a developing trend in the Eleventh Circuit to undertake exacting reviews of class action settlements.
October 20, 2020 In the News

Kennedy, Davis Quoted in Law360 About Incentive Payments in Class Action Settlements

Partner Richard Davis and Senior Counsel Christina Kennedy were quoted in the Law360 article, 鈥4 Tips To Get Workplace Class Action Settlements Approved,鈥 which advised employment lawyers to consider retooling class action settlement agreements to make sure that incentive payments for lead plaintiffs don't blow up the whole deal in light of a recent Eleventh Circuit ruling.
Row of stone columns with detailed bases and shafts, forming a colonnade in a classical architectural style, often seen at law offices or courthouses providing litigation support to lawyers in Chicago.
September 22, 2020 Blogs

Divided Eleventh Circuit Panel Bars Incentive Awards for Class Representatives in Class Action Settlements

While not authorized by Rule 23, incentive awards to class representatives are a common feature of class action settlements. Nevertheless, a divided Eleventh Circuit panel ruled last Thursday that such payments are strictly prohibited by 鈥渙n-point Supreme Court precedent鈥 from the 1880s.